material

CoO
ID:

mp-22408
Tags: Cobalt oxide

Material Details

Final Magnetic Moment
0.000 μB

Calculated total magnetic moment for the unit cell within the magnetic ordering provided (see below). Typically accurate to the second digit.
Magnetic Ordering
AFM
Formation Energy / Atom
-1.410 eV

Calculated formation energy from the elements normalized to per atom in the unit cell.

Energy Above Hull / Atom
0.000 eV

The energy of decomposition of this material into the set of most stable materials at this chemical composition, in eV/atom. Stability is tested against all potential chemical combinations that result in the material's composition. For example, a Co2O3 structure would be tested for decomposition against other Co2O3 structures, against Co and O2 mixtures, and against CoO and O2 mixtures.

Density
5.12 g/cm3

The calculated bulk crystalline density, typically underestimated due calculated cell volumes overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%)

Decomposes To
Stable
Band Gap
0.843 eV

In general, band gaps computed with common exchange-correlation functionals such as the LDA and GGA are severely underestimated. Typically the disagreement is reported to be ~50% in the literature. Some internal testing by the Materials Project supports these statements; typically, we find that band gaps are underestimated by ~40%. We additionally find that several known insulators are predicted to be metallic.

Space Group

Hermann Mauguin
F43m [216]
Hall
F 4 2 3
Point Group
42m
Crystal System
cubic

Electronic Structure

Topological data for ICSD ID 29082 from Topological Materials Database
Topological Classification
SM*
Subclassification
ESFD†
Crossing Type
Point
* Semimetal
† Enforced Semimetal with Fermi point Degeneracy

Band Structure and Density of States

Warning! Semi-local DFT tends to severely underestimate bandgaps. Please see the wiki for more info.

X-Ray Diffraction

    Select radiation source:
  • Cu
  • Ag
  • Mo
  • Fe

Calculated powder diffraction pattern; note that peak spacings may be affected due to inaccuracies in calculated cell volume, which is typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%)

X-Ray Absorption Spectra

FEFF XANES

Select an element to display a spectrum averaged over all sites of that element in the structure.

Apply Gaussian smoothing:

0 eV
3 eV
FWHM: 0 eV

Download spectra for every symmetrically equivalent absorption site in the structure.

Download FEFF Input parameters.

Warning: These results are intended to be semi-quantitative in that corrections, such as edge shifts and Debye-Waller damping, have not been included.

Substrates

Reference for minimal coincident interface area (MCIA) and elastic energy:
substrate orientation:
substrate material substrate orientation film orientation elastic energy [meV] MCIA† [Å2]
Al2O3 (mp-1143) <0 0 1> <1 1 1> 0.000 259.9
CdSe (mp-2691) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.000 193.0
Cu (mp-30) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.002 333.5
GaSb (mp-1156) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.003 193.0
TiO2 (mp-2657) <1 0 1> <1 0 0> 0.008 128.6
BaF2 (mp-1029) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.011 333.5
PbSe (mp-2201) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.012 193.0
Ni (mp-23) <1 1 1> <1 1 1> 0.012 148.5
TePb (mp-19717) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.016 42.9
TePb (mp-19717) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.017 60.6
SiC (mp-8062) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.022 171.5
C (mp-48) <0 0 1> <1 1 1> 0.022 37.1
BN (mp-984) <0 0 1> <1 1 1> 0.023 148.5
SiC (mp-8062) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.024 242.6
SiC (mp-7631) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.026 242.6
NaCl (mp-22862) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.031 91.0
ZnO (mp-2133) <1 0 1> <1 0 0> 0.034 235.8
Au (mp-81) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.036 272.9
ZnTe (mp-2176) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.040 193.0
C (mp-48) <1 0 1> <1 0 0> 0.043 321.6
Ag (mp-124) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.044 85.8
TiO2 (mp-2657) <0 0 1> <1 0 0> 0.045 21.4
YAlO3 (mp-3792) <0 1 1> <1 1 0> 0.045 242.6
TiO2 (mp-390) <1 0 0> <1 1 0> 0.047 333.5
ZnO (mp-2133) <0 0 1> <1 1 1> 0.049 37.1
InAs (mp-20305) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.050 193.0
TiO2 (mp-2657) <1 1 1> <1 1 1> 0.052 259.9
NdGaO3 (mp-3196) <0 0 1> <1 1 1> 0.054 185.7
Ge(Bi3O5)4 (mp-23352) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.058 107.2
KTaO3 (mp-3614) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.062 91.0
KTaO3 (mp-3614) <1 1 1> <1 1 1> 0.063 111.4
AlN (mp-661) <0 0 1> <1 1 1> 0.067 111.4
WSe2 (mp-1821) <1 1 1> <1 1 1> 0.068 259.9
SiC (mp-7631) <1 1 1> <1 1 0> 0.088 242.6
LiNbO3 (mp-3731) <1 1 0> <1 0 0> 0.089 128.6
Ag (mp-124) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.097 272.9
KCl (mp-23193) <1 1 1> <1 0 0> 0.099 214.4
PbSe (mp-2201) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.103 333.5
Au (mp-81) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 0.108 85.8
SiC (mp-7631) <1 0 0> <1 1 0> 0.110 333.5
DyScO3 (mp-31120) <1 0 0> <1 1 0> 0.115 91.0
Te2W (mp-22693) <0 0 1> <1 1 0> 0.116 242.6
Al (mp-134) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.119 91.0
AlN (mp-661) <1 1 0> <1 1 0> 0.122 242.6
Al (mp-134) <1 1 1> <1 1 1> 0.122 111.4
SiC (mp-11714) <0 0 1> <1 0 0> 0.123 171.5
SiC (mp-7631) <0 0 1> <1 0 0> 0.132 171.5
DyScO3 (mp-31120) <0 0 1> <1 1 1> 0.133 185.7
Mg (mp-153) <1 0 0> <1 1 0> 0.138 181.9
MgF2 (mp-1249) <1 1 1> <1 0 0> 0.138 150.1
Up to 50 entries displayed.
†minimal coincident interface area.

Elasticity

A full elastic tensor has not been calculated for this material. Registered users can view statistical-learning-based predictions of this material's bulk and shear moduli.

Once you have registered you can also "vote" for full calculation of this material's elastic properties.

Piezoelectricity

Reference for tensor and properties: Methodology
Piezoelectric Tensor eij (C/m2)
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.33129 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.33129 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.33129
Piezoelectric Modulus ‖eij‖max
0.33129 C/m2
Crystallographic Direction vmax
1.00000
0.00000
0.00000

Dielectric Properties

Reference for tensor and properties: Methodology
Dielectric Tensor εij∞ (electronic contribution)
5.85 0.00 0.00
0.00 5.85 0.00
0.00 0.00 5.85
Dielectric Tensor εij (total)
10.05 0.00 0.00
0.00 10.05 0.00
0.00 0.00 10.05
Polycrystalline dielectric constant εpoly∞
(electronic contribution)
5.85
Polycrystalline dielectric constant εpoly
(total)
10.05
Refractive Index n
2.42
Potentially ferroelectric?
Unknown

Similar Structures beta feature

Explanation of dissimilarity measure: Documentation.
material dissimilarity Ehull # of elements
Zn3CrS4 (mp-1080726) 0.0175 0.129 3
Zn3CrSe4 (mp-1095028) 0.0124 0.287 3
Zn3CrTe4 (mp-1087545) 0.0105 0.114 3
CdSnSb2 (mp-10063) 0.0250 0.000 3
GaCuS2 (mp-5238) 0.0192 0.000 3
FeCu2GeS4 (mp-917359) 0.0383 0.185 4
CoCu2GeS4 (mp-6498) 0.0382 0.055 4
CoCu2GeS4 (mp-560428) 0.0476 0.055 4
FeCu2GeS4 (mp-22053) 0.0260 0.185 4
FeCu2GeSe4 (mp-1087471) 0.0871 0.036 4
ZrO (mp-33088) 0.0000 0.424 2
CoO (mp-557513) 0.0000 0.000 2
ZnNi (mp-567903) 0.0000 1.083 2
BeTe (mp-252) 0.0000 0.000 2
GaN (mp-830) 0.0000 0.005 2
Si (mp-149) 0.0000 0.000 1
Sn (mp-117) 0.0000 0.000 1
C (mp-66) 0.0000 0.136 1
Ge (mp-32) 0.0000 0.000 1
Se (mp-12771) 0.0000 0.514 1
Up to 5 similar elemental, binary, ternary, quaternary, etc. structures displayed (dissimilarity threshold 0.75). Ehull: energy above hull per atom [eV].

Synthesis Descriptions

10.1002/chem.201303814
The N-doped CoO (N-CoO) films were prepared by electrolysis of an N2-saturated 0.05M solution of CoCl2 in acetonitrile at 1.0V (vs. Ag/AgCl), which produced a black film on the cathodic ITO surface [...]
10.1006/jcat.2001.3488
CoOMoO3/MgO and NiOMoO3/MgO catalysts were prepared from MoO3/MgO by impregnation with methanol solutions of Co nitrate and Ni nitrate, respectively, followed by calcination at 350C. The texture of [...]
chef hat mixing beaker

Explore more synthesis descriptions for materials of composition CoO.

Text computed by synthesisproject.org.

Calculation Summary

Structure Optimization

Run Type
GGA+U
Energy Cutoff
520 eV
# of K-points
None
U Values
Co: 3.32 eV
Pseudopotentials
VASP PAW: Co O
Final Energy/Atom
-6.1500 eV
Corrected Energy
-59.5053 eV
-59.5053 eV = -49.2002 eV (uncorrected energy) - 7.4960 eV (MP Advanced Correction) - 2.8092 eV (MP Anion Correction)

Detailed input parameters and outputs for all calculations

Show JSON History Show BibTex Citation Download BibTex Citation
ICSD IDs
  • 29082
Submitted by
User remarks:
  • Cobalt oxide

Displaying lattice parameters for primitive cell; note that calculated cell volumes are typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%). Note the primitive cell may appear less symmetric than the conventional cell representation (see "Structure Type" selector below the 3d structure)