Final Magnetic Moment24.996 μBCalculated total magnetic moment for the unit cell within the magnetic ordering provided (see below). Typically accurate to the second digit. |
Magnetic OrderingFM |
Formation Energy / Atom-2.682 eVCalculated formation energy from the elements normalized to per atom in the unit cell. |
Energy Above Hull / Atom0.060 eVThe energy of decomposition of this material into the set of most stable materials at this chemical composition, in eV/atom. Stability is tested against all potential chemical combinations that result in the material's composition. For example, a Co2O3 structure would be tested for decomposition against other Co2O3 structures, against Co and O2 mixtures, and against CoO and O2 mixtures. |
Density6.94 g/cm3The calculated bulk crystalline density, typically underestimated due calculated cell volumes overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%) |
Decomposes ToFe2O3 + Lu2O3 |
Band Gap1.629 eVIn general, band gaps computed with common exchange-correlation functionals such as the LDA and GGA are severely underestimated. Typically the disagreement is reported to be ~50% in the literature. Some internal testing by the Materials Project supports these statements; typically, we find that band gaps are underestimated by ~40%. We additionally find that several known insulators are predicted to be metallic. |
Hermann MauguinIa3d [230] |
Hall-I 4bd 2c 3 |
Point Groupm3m |
Crystal Systemcubic |
Calculated powder diffraction pattern; note that peak spacings may be affected due to inaccuracies in calculated cell volume, which is typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%)
Select an element to display a spectrum averaged over all sites of that element in the structure.
Apply Gaussian smoothing:
Download spectra for every symmetrically equivalent absorption site in the structure.
Download FEFF Input parameters.
substrate material | substrate orientation | film orientation | MCIA† [Å2] |
---|---|---|---|
InAs (mp-20305) | <1 0 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
Y3Fe5O12 (mp-19648) | <1 0 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
MgO (mp-1265) | <1 1 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
SiC (mp-8062) | <1 0 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
GaSb (mp-1156) | <1 0 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
SrTiO3 (mp-4651) | <0 0 1> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
GaP (mp-2490) | <1 0 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
CaF2 (mp-2741) | <1 0 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
PbSe (mp-2201) | <1 0 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
ZnTe (mp-2176) | <1 0 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
Ga2O3 (mp-886) | <1 0 -1> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
CdSe (mp-2691) | <1 0 0> | <1 0 0> | 153.7 |
A full elastic tensor has not been calculated for this material. Registered users can view statistical-learning-based predictions of this material's bulk and shear moduli.
Once you have registered you can also "vote" for full calculation of this material's elastic properties.
material | dissimilarity | Ehull | # of elements |
---|---|---|---|
Dy3Fe5O12 (mp-645157) | 0.1104 | 0.022 | 3 |
Ho3Fe5O12 (mp-781609) | 0.0933 | 0.029 | 3 |
Er3Fe5O12 (mp-566912) | 0.0643 | 0.035 | 3 |
Lu3Ga5O12 (mp-14134) | 0.0864 | 0.000 | 3 |
Y3Fe5O12 (mp-565957) | 0.1226 | 0.024 | 3 |
Mg3Fe2(GeO4)3 (mvc-4828) | 0.2118 | 0.064 | 4 |
Mg3Mn2(GeO4)3 (mvc-5151) | 0.2015 | 0.208 | 4 |
Mg3Ni2(GeO4)3 (mvc-4482) | 0.1615 | 0.135 | 4 |
Mg3Co2(GeO4)3 (mvc-4438) | 0.2039 | 0.155 | 4 |
Mg3Cu2(GeO4)3 (mvc-4251) | 0.1996 | 0.160 | 4 |
Ca2YFe4SbO12 (mp-743862) | 0.4442 | 0.016 | 5 |
Ca2YFe3(SnO6)2 (mp-694869) | 0.4206 | 0.008 | 5 |
Na2CaSn2(GeO4)3 (mp-677095) | 0.4292 | 0.000 | 5 |
Li6Nd6Sb(TeO8)3 (mp-532789) | 0.3915 | 0.009 | 5 |
CaGd2Zr(GaO3)4 (mp-686296) | 0.3671 | 0.000 | 5 |
Ca11YAl15Cr4SiO48 (mp-743917) | 0.5667 | 0.116 | 6 |
Ca3Y9Al18CrSiO48 (mp-744910) | 0.5754 | 0.021 | 6 |
Ca4Y2Al7Cr2SiO24 (mp-743704) | 0.5959 | 0.104 | 6 |
Run TypeGGA+U |
Energy Cutoff520 eV |
# of K-pointsNone |
U ValuesFe: 5.3 eV |
PseudopotentialsVASP PAW: Lu_3 Fe_pv O |
Final Energy/Atom-7.3414 eV |
Corrected Energy-675.6816 eV
-675.6816 eV = -587.3117 eV (uncorrected energy) - 54.6600 eV (MP Advanced Correction) - 33.7099 eV (MP Anion Correction)
|
Displaying lattice parameters for primitive cell; note that calculated cell volumes are typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%). Note the primitive cell may appear less symmetric than the conventional cell representation (see "Structure Type" selector below the 3d structure)