material

Li4Cu7(PO4)6
ID:

mp-762050
DOI:

10.17188/1292429

Material Details

Final Magnetic Moment
2.557 μB

Calculated total magnetic moment for the unit cell within the magnetic ordering provided (see below). Typically accurate to the second digit.
Magnetic Ordering
FiM
Formation Energy / Atom
-2.032 eV

Calculated formation energy from the elements normalized to per atom in the unit cell.

Energy Above Hull / Atom
0.085 eV

The energy of decomposition of this material into the set of most stable materials at this chemical composition, in eV/atom. Stability is tested against all potential chemical combinations that result in the material's composition. For example, a Co2O3 structure would be tested for decomposition against other Co2O3 structures, against Co and O2 mixtures, and against CoO and O2 mixtures.

Density
3.75 g/cm3

The calculated bulk crystalline density, typically underestimated due calculated cell volumes overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%)

Decomposes To
Cu3(PO4)2 + Li2CuP2O7 + CuO
Band Gap
0.000 eV

In general, band gaps computed with common exchange-correlation functionals such as the LDA and GGA are severely underestimated. Typically the disagreement is reported to be ~50% in the literature. Some internal testing by the Materials Project supports these statements; typically, we find that band gaps are underestimated by ~40%. We additionally find that several known insulators are predicted to be metallic.

Space Group

Hermann Mauguin
Cm [8]
Hall
C 2y
Point Group
m
Crystal System
monoclinic

Electronic Structure

Band Structure and Density of States

Warning! Semi-local DFT tends to severely underestimate bandgaps. Please see the wiki for more info.

X-Ray Diffraction

    Select radiation source:
  • Cu
  • Ag
  • Mo
  • Fe

Calculated powder diffraction pattern; note that peak spacings may be affected due to inaccuracies in calculated cell volume, which is typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%)

Substrates

Reference for minimal coincident interface area (MCIA) and elastic energy:
substrate orientation:
No elastic tensor calculated for this material, so elastic energies not avaialable. Sorting by MCIA instead.
substrate material substrate orientation film orientation MCIA† [Å2]
AlN (mp-661) <1 0 1> <0 1 0> 326.3
BaF2 (mp-1029) <1 0 0> <1 0 1> 194.0
BaF2 (mp-1029) <1 1 0> <0 1 0> 326.3
GaN (mp-804) <0 0 1> <0 1 0> 195.8
GaN (mp-804) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 267.7
GaN (mp-804) <1 0 1> <1 0 0> 267.7
SiO2 (mp-6930) <1 0 1> <0 1 0> 326.3
KCl (mp-23193) <1 0 0> <0 1 0> 326.3
InAs (mp-20305) <1 0 0> <1 0 1> 194.0
InAs (mp-20305) <1 1 0> <1 0 0> 267.7
YVO4 (mp-19133) <1 0 1> <1 0 0> 267.7
Te2Mo (mp-602) <0 0 1> <0 1 1> 164.8
Te2Mo (mp-602) <1 0 1> <0 1 1> 164.8
Te2W (mp-22693) <0 0 1> <1 0 0> 89.2
YVO4 (mp-19133) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 89.2
LiNbO3 (mp-3731) <1 0 0> <0 0 1> 151.4
BN (mp-984) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 267.7
BN (mp-984) <1 1 0> <1 0 0> 267.7
MoS2 (mp-1434) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 267.7
MoS2 (mp-1434) <0 0 1> <0 1 0> 195.8
MoS2 (mp-1434) <1 0 1> <1 0 0> 267.7
TeO2 (mp-2125) <0 0 1> <1 1 0> 221.1
LiGaO2 (mp-5854) <1 1 0> <0 1 0> 326.3
LiTaO3 (mp-3666) <1 0 0> <0 0 1> 151.4
TiO2 (mp-2657) <0 0 1> <1 0 1> 194.0
TiO2 (mp-2657) <1 0 1> <1 0 -1> 155.3
TiO2 (mp-2657) <1 1 0> <0 1 0> 195.8
C (mp-66) <1 1 0> <0 1 0> 326.3
KP(HO2)2 (mp-23959) <0 1 0> <0 0 1> 151.4
Mg (mp-153) <1 0 0> <1 0 0> 267.7
LaF3 (mp-905) <1 0 1> <1 0 0> 267.7
PbS (mp-21276) <1 0 0> <0 1 0> 261.0
KP(HO2)2 (mp-23959) <0 0 1> <0 0 1> 151.4
InP (mp-20351) <1 0 0> <0 1 0> 261.0
Ni (mp-23) <1 0 0> <0 1 0> 261.0
PbSe (mp-2201) <1 0 0> <1 0 1> 194.0
PbSe (mp-2201) <1 1 0> <0 1 0> 326.3
BaTiO3 (mp-5986) <1 0 1> <0 1 0> 261.0
NdGaO3 (mp-3196) <0 1 1> <0 1 0> 261.0
NdGaO3 (mp-3196) <1 1 1> <1 0 0> 267.7
SiC (mp-11714) <1 0 1> <1 0 0> 267.7
SiC (mp-11714) <1 1 1> <0 1 0> 326.3
CdWO4 (mp-19387) <1 1 0> <0 1 0> 326.3
TiO2 (mp-390) <1 1 1> <0 1 0> 326.3
Ga2O3 (mp-886) <1 0 -1> <0 1 0> 261.0
Ga2O3 (mp-886) <1 0 0> <0 1 0> 326.3
ZnO (mp-2133) <1 1 1> <1 1 0> 221.1
CdSe (mp-2691) <1 0 0> <1 0 1> 194.0
CdSe (mp-2691) <1 1 0> <0 1 0> 326.3
GaSb (mp-1156) <1 0 0> <1 0 1> 194.0
Up to 50 entries displayed.
†minimal coincident interface area.

Elasticity

A full elastic tensor has not been calculated for this material. Registered users can view statistical-learning-based predictions of this material's bulk and shear moduli.

Once you have registered you can also "vote" for full calculation of this material's elastic properties.

Similar Structures beta feature

Explanation of dissimilarity measure: Documentation.
material dissimilarity Ehull # of elements
FeSiO3 (mp-630331) 0.6577 0.038 3
FeSiO3 (mp-650392) 0.6049 0.821 3
Fe4(PO4)3 (mp-31780) 0.5923 0.007 3
MnSiO3 (mp-565815) 0.6071 0.007 3
MnSiO3 (mp-19528) 0.6241 0.007 3
Li4Mn7(PO4)6 (mp-850081) 0.3074 0.074 4
Li3Mn2(PO4)3 (mp-761591) 0.4266 0.190 4
Li4Fe7(PO4)6 (mp-762524) 0.4125 0.487 4
Li4Cr7(PO4)6 (mp-780503) 0.3006 0.153 4
Li4Ni7(PO4)6 (mp-687026) 0.4317 0.156 4
Li3MnV(PO4)3 (mp-774954) 0.4810 0.241 5
Li3MnV(PO4)3 (mp-774311) 0.4947 0.208 5
Li3MnV(PO4)3 (mp-779876) 0.4505 0.219 5
Li3MnV(PO4)3 (mp-779368) 0.4652 0.244 5
Li3MnV(PO4)3 (mp-779367) 0.4630 0.145 5
Li4NbFe3Cu2(PO4)6 (mp-777855) 0.7031 3.892 6
Li4Mn2Fe3P6WO24 (mp-770860) 0.6761 0.174 6
Li2MgCr3Se3(SO8)3 (mp-773983) 0.6916 0.041 6
Li4Mn2VNi3(PO4)6 (mp-770417) 0.6971 0.075 6
Li4TiCo2Ni3(PO4)6 (mp-778251) 0.7112 0.203 6
Ca2Al2FeSi4BHO16 (mp-540713) 0.6588 0.068 7
Up to 5 similar elemental, binary, ternary, quaternary, etc. structures displayed (dissimilarity threshold 0.75). Ehull: energy above hull per atom [eV].

Calculation Summary

Structure Optimization

Run Type
GGA
Energy Cutoff
520 eV
# of K-points
None
U Values
--
Pseudopotentials
VASP PAW: Li_sv Cu_pv P O
Final Energy/Atom
-6.1952 eV
Corrected Energy
-270.4897 eV
Uncorrected energy = -254.0017 eV Composition-based energy adjustment (-0.687 eV/atom x 24.0 atoms) = -16.4880 eV Corrected energy = -270.4897 eV

Detailed input parameters and outputs for all calculations

Show JSON History Show BibTex Citation Download BibTex Citation
Submitted by

Displaying lattice parameters for primitive cell; note that calculated cell volumes are typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%). Note the primitive cell may appear less symmetric than the conventional cell representation (see "Structure Type" selector below the 3d structure)