material

LiFePO4
ID:

mp-773692
DOI:

10.17188/1302092

Material Details

Final Magnetic Moment
48.000 μB

Calculated total magnetic moment for the unit cell within the magnetic ordering provided (see below). Typically accurate to the second digit.
Magnetic Ordering
FM
Formation Energy / Atom
-2.493 eV

Calculated formation energy from the elements normalized to per atom in the unit cell.

Energy Above Hull / Atom
0.059 eV

The energy of decomposition of this material into the set of most stable materials at this chemical composition, in eV/atom. Stability is tested against all potential chemical combinations that result in the material's composition. For example, a Co2O3 structure would be tested for decomposition against other Co2O3 structures, against Co and O2 mixtures, and against CoO and O2 mixtures.

Density
2.97 g/cm3

The calculated bulk crystalline density, typically underestimated due calculated cell volumes overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%)

Decomposes To
LiFePO4
Band Gap
3.545 eV

In general, band gaps computed with common exchange-correlation functionals such as the LDA and GGA are severely underestimated. Typically the disagreement is reported to be ~50% in the literature. Some internal testing by the Materials Project supports these statements; typically, we find that band gaps are underestimated by ~40%. We additionally find that several known insulators are predicted to be metallic.

Space Group

Hermann Mauguin
P21/c [14]
Hall
-P 2ybc
Point Group
2/m
Crystal System
monoclinic
We have not yet calculated a detailed bandstructure for this material

X-Ray Diffraction

    Select radiation source:
  • Cu
  • Ag
  • Mo
  • Fe

Calculated powder diffraction pattern; note that peak spacings may be affected due to inaccuracies in calculated cell volume, which is typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%)

Substrates

Reference for minimal coincident interface area (MCIA) and elastic energy:
substrate orientation:
No elastic tensor calculated for this material, so elastic energies not avaialable. Sorting by MCIA instead.
substrate material substrate orientation film orientation MCIA† [Å2]
AlN (mp-661) <1 1 0> <1 0 -1> 242.1
CeO2 (mp-20194) <1 0 0> <1 0 -1> 121.1
CeO2 (mp-20194) <1 1 1> <0 0 1> 207.3
GaAs (mp-2534) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 138.2
BaF2 (mp-1029) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 276.4
SiO2 (mp-6930) <1 1 1> <0 0 1> 207.3
DyScO3 (mp-31120) <1 0 0> <0 0 1> 138.2
ZnSe (mp-1190) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 138.2
KTaO3 (mp-3614) <1 1 0> <1 0 0> 138.2
InAs (mp-20305) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 276.4
Bi2Te3 (mp-34202) <0 0 1> <0 0 1> 69.1
BN (mp-984) <1 0 0> <0 0 1> 138.2
BN (mp-984) <1 0 1> <0 0 1> 138.2
BN (mp-984) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 69.1
BN (mp-984) <1 1 1> <1 0 -1> 242.1
Te2W (mp-22693) <0 1 0> <0 0 1> 276.4
LiNbO3 (mp-3731) <1 0 1> <1 0 -1> 242.1
Te2Mo (mp-602) <1 0 0> <0 0 1> 276.4
SiC (mp-7631) <1 0 0> <1 0 -1> 242.1
SiC (mp-7631) <1 0 1> <1 0 -1> 242.1
SiC (mp-7631) <1 1 1> <1 0 -1> 242.1
Al (mp-134) <1 1 0> <1 0 0> 138.2
TeO2 (mp-2125) <0 0 1> <1 1 0> 192.5
TeO2 (mp-2125) <1 1 1> <0 0 1> 207.3
SiC (mp-7631) <1 1 0> <1 0 -1> 242.1
Fe3O4 (mp-19306) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 207.3
MgO (mp-1265) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 207.3
TiO2 (mp-2657) <1 0 1> <1 1 -1> 180.6
C (mp-66) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 276.4
GdScO3 (mp-5690) <0 0 1> <1 1 0> 192.5
GaP (mp-2490) <1 0 0> <1 0 -1> 121.1
GaP (mp-2490) <1 1 1> <0 0 1> 207.3
GdScO3 (mp-5690) <1 0 0> <0 0 1> 138.2
Mg (mp-153) <1 0 1> <0 0 1> 276.4
BaTiO3 (mp-5986) <1 0 1> <1 0 0> 138.2
NdGaO3 (mp-3196) <1 1 0> <1 0 -1> 121.1
NdGaO3 (mp-3196) <1 1 1> <1 0 0> 138.2
PbS (mp-21276) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 207.3
TbScO3 (mp-31119) <1 0 0> <0 0 1> 138.2
MoSe2 (mp-1634) <1 1 0> <1 1 -1> 180.6
Ga2O3 (mp-886) <1 0 0> <1 1 -1> 180.6
PbSe (mp-2201) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 276.4
Si (mp-149) <1 0 0> <1 0 -1> 121.1
CdSe (mp-2691) <1 1 0> <0 0 1> 276.4
SiC (mp-11714) <1 0 0> <0 0 1> 276.4
MoSe2 (mp-1634) <0 0 1> <1 1 0> 192.5
MoSe2 (mp-1634) <1 1 1> <0 0 1> 276.4
C (mp-48) <1 0 0> <0 0 1> 138.2
C (mp-48) <1 1 1> <1 0 -1> 242.1
Si (mp-149) <1 1 1> <0 0 1> 207.3
Up to 50 entries displayed.
†minimal coincident interface area.

Elasticity

A full elastic tensor has not been calculated for this material. Registered users can view statistical-learning-based predictions of this material's bulk and shear moduli.

Once you have registered you can also "vote" for full calculation of this material's elastic properties.

Similar Structures beta feature

Explanation of dissimilarity measure: Documentation.
material dissimilarity Ehull # of elements
Na2Ti2O5 (mp-779477) 0.4135 0.028 3
Na2Ti2O5 (mp-760979) 0.6313 0.033 3
Na2Ti2O5 (mp-779729) 0.5331 0.037 3
Na2Ti2O5 (mp-762058) 0.4433 0.033 3
Na2V2O5 (mp-764595) 0.4988 0.092 3
LiNiPO4 (mp-766646) 0.3010 0.071 4
LiNiPO4 (mp-766645) 0.2872 0.079 4
LiMnPO4 (mp-761542) 0.3218 0.056 4
LiMnPO4 (mp-761538) 0.2273 0.058 4
LiCuPO4 (mp-759823) 0.3096 0.086 4
Li3CoPCO7 (mp-771592) 0.7221 0.043 5
Li3BePCO7 (mp-771341) 0.6734 0.052 5
Li3TlPCO7 (mp-771334) 0.7104 0.110 5
Li3MnPCO7 (mp-763832) 0.7299 0.054 5
Li5Mn2P2(CO7)2 (mp-770047) 0.7163 0.040 5
Up to 5 similar elemental, binary, ternary, quaternary, etc. structures displayed (dissimilarity threshold 0.75). Ehull: energy above hull per atom [eV].

Synthesis Descriptions

10.1016/j.elecom.2005.04.018
LiFePO4 was prepared by solid-state reaction of a 1:1:1 (molar ratio) mixture of iron(II) oxalate, ammonium di-hydrogen phosphate, and lithium carbonate. The precursors were mixed by ball milling in a [...]
10.1002/ejic.200501013
Lithium iron phosphate was obtained as follows: FeC2O42H2O (1.80 g; Fluka), (NH4)2HPO4 (1.32 g; Fluka), LiC5H7O2 (1.60 g; Strem Chemicals), and H2C2O42H2O (8 g; Fluka) were ball-milled in a Retsch m [...]
chef hat mixing beaker

Explore more synthesis descriptions for materials of composition LiFePO4.

Text computed by synthesisproject.org.

Calculation Summary

Structure Optimization

Run Type
GGA+U
Energy Cutoff
520 eV
# of K-points
None
U Values
Fe: 5.3 eV
Pseudopotentials
VASP PAW: Li_sv Fe_pv P O
Final Energy/Atom
-6.7745 eV
Corrected Energy
-635.5611 eV
-635.5611 eV = -569.0552 eV (uncorrected energy) - 33.7099 eV (MP Anion Correction) - 32.7960 eV (MP Advanced Correction)

Detailed input parameters and outputs for all calculations

Show JSON History Show BibTex Citation Download BibTex Citation
Submitted by

Displaying lattice parameters for primitive cell; note that calculated cell volumes are typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%). Note the primitive cell may appear less symmetric than the conventional cell representation (see "Structure Type" selector below the 3d structure)