Final Magnetic Moment15.000 μBCalculated total magnetic moment for the unit cell within the magnetic ordering provided (see below). Typically accurate to the second digit. |
Magnetic OrderingFM |
Formation Energy / Atom-2.616 eVCalculated formation energy from the elements normalized to per atom in the unit cell. |
Energy Above Hull / Atom0.000 eVThe energy of decomposition of this material into the set of most stable materials at this chemical composition, in eV/atom. Stability is tested against all potential chemical combinations that result in the material's composition. For example, a Co2O3 structure would be tested for decomposition against other Co2O3 structures, against Co and O2 mixtures, and against CoO and O2 mixtures. |
Density3.26 g/cm3The calculated bulk crystalline density, typically underestimated due calculated cell volumes overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%) |
Decomposes ToStable |
Band Gap2.244 eVIn general, band gaps computed with common exchange-correlation functionals such as the LDA and GGA are severely underestimated. Typically the disagreement is reported to be ~50% in the literature. Some internal testing by the Materials Project supports these statements; typically, we find that band gaps are underestimated by ~40%. We additionally find that several known insulators are predicted to be metallic. |
Hermann MauguinPbca [61] |
Hall-P 2ac 2ab |
Point Groupmmm |
Crystal Systemorthorhombic |
Calculated powder diffraction pattern; note that peak spacings may be affected due to inaccuracies in calculated cell volume, which is typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%)
Select an element to display a spectrum averaged over all sites of that element in the structure.
Apply Gaussian smoothing:
Download spectra for every symmetrically equivalent absorption site in the structure.
Download FEFF Input parameters.
substrate material | substrate orientation | film orientation | MCIA† [Å2] |
---|---|---|---|
LaAlO3 (mp-2920) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
LaAlO3 (mp-2920) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
LaAlO3 (mp-2920) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
BaF2 (mp-1029) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
GaN (mp-804) | <0 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
KCl (mp-23193) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
DyScO3 (mp-31120) | <1 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
InAs (mp-20305) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
TePb (mp-19717) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
LiNbO3 (mp-3731) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
LiNbO3 (mp-3731) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
LiGaO2 (mp-5854) | <1 0 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
CdTe (mp-406) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
LiTaO3 (mp-3666) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
LiTaO3 (mp-3666) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
TiO2 (mp-2657) | <1 0 0> | <0 0 1> | 84.1 |
GdScO3 (mp-5690) | <1 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
TbScO3 (mp-31119) | <1 0 1> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
InSb (mp-20012) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
PbSe (mp-2201) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
CdSe (mp-2691) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
CdWO4 (mp-19387) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
CdWO4 (mp-19387) | <1 0 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
TiO2 (mp-390) | <1 0 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
TiO2 (mp-390) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
GaSb (mp-1156) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
Cu (mp-30) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
Al2O3 (mp-1143) | <1 0 0> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
Fe2O3 (mp-24972) | <1 1 1> | <0 0 1> | 252.2 |
ZnTe (mp-2176) | <1 1 0> | <0 0 1> | 168.1 |
A full elastic tensor has not been calculated for this material. Registered users can view statistical-learning-based predictions of this material's bulk and shear moduli.
Once you have registered you can also "vote" for full calculation of this material's elastic properties.
Run TypeGGA+U |
Energy Cutoff520 eV |
# of K-pointsNone |
U ValuesFe: 5.3 eV |
PseudopotentialsVASP PAW: Na_pv Ca_sv Fe_pv P O |
Final Energy/Atom-7.0206 eV |
Corrected Energy-1546.1997 eV
Uncorrected energy = -1404.1197 eV
Composition-based energy adjustment (-0.687 eV/atom x 128.0 atoms) = -87.9360 eV
Composition-based energy adjustment (-2.256 eV/atom x 24.0 atoms) = -54.1440 eV
Corrected energy = -1546.1997 eV
|
Displaying lattice parameters for primitive cell; note that calculated cell volumes are typically overestimated on average by 3% (+/- 6%). Note the primitive cell may appear less symmetric than the conventional cell representation (see "Structure Type" selector below the 3d structure)